In Kenyan politics, language carries weight. The phrase “Kasinde politics” has recently gained attention, rooted in   Rigathi Gachagua’s reference to the Kamba community as “cousins.” While on the surface this might seem like a gesture of goodwill, it is a deliberate political strategy.

The word “Kasinde,” which means cousin in some local dialects, now symbolizes a broader plan to foster unity between the Mt. Kenya region and Ukambani. This approach is aimed at merging two influential ethnic blocs to maximize political influence.

A Strategic Alliance Through Ethnic Kinship

Gachagua’s choice of words taps into the cultural history shared by the Kikuyu and Kamba communities. By emphasizing familial bonds, he sought to frame a political alliance not just as a coalition, but as a natural extension of longstanding social ties.

This tactic is designed to strengthen support beyond Gachagua’s traditional base in Mt. Kenya, reaching into the Ukambani region. The idea is to create a powerful voting bloc united by perceived kinship rather than just political convenience.

Rising Concerns Over Ethnic Politics

Despite its apparent intent to unite, this rhetoric has sparked criticism. Many view it as a revival of ethnic politics that risks deepening divisions rather than healing them. The notion of “cousinship” has been perceived by some as a way to exclude other communities from political discourse.

Leaders and analysts warn that such ethnic appeals undermine national cohesion. They argue that political leadership should promote inclusivity and move away from tribal identities that have historically fueled conflict.

Positioning for 2027: The Political Calculus

This ethnic alliance rhetoric also serves a clear political purpose. Following Gachagua’s impeachment, the need to rebuild influence and support is urgent. Aligning Mt. Kenya and Ukambani could deliver critical votes in upcoming elections, particularly in Nairobi and surrounding areas.

The “Kasinde” narrative is a call to potential allies, signaling Gachagua’s readiness to forge new partnerships and reclaim political relevance ahead of 2027.

Public Response and Political Risks

The public reaction has been mixed but notably wary. While some appreciate the appeal to shared identity, many see it as a divisive tactic. Online discussions reflect skepticism toward leaders who rely on ethnic identity as a political tool.

The term “Kasinde politics” has come to represent a cautionary label—one that highlights the dangers of ethnic mobilization in a country striving for unity and progress.

Conclusion: Between Kinship and Politics

Gachagua’s “Kasinde politics” strategy highlights the complexities of ethnicity in Kenyan politics. It is a reminder that while cultural ties can be a source of strength, they can also be weaponized. As Kenya approaches the next general elections, the challenge remains to balance ethnic identity with national unity in a way that fosters peace and inclusive governance.