Your Read is on the Way
Every Story Matters
Every Story Matters
The Hydropower Boom in Africa: A Green Energy Revolution Africa is tapping into its immense hydropower potential, ushering in an era of renewable energy. With monumental projects like Ethiopia’s Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) and the Inga Dams in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the continent is gearing up to address its energy demands sustainably while driving economic growth.
Northern Kenya is a region rich in resources, cultural diversity, and strategic trade potential, yet it remains underutilized in the national development agenda.
Can AI Help cure HIV AIDS in 2025
Why Ruiru is Almost Dominating Thika in 2025
Mathare Exposed! Discover Mathare-Nairobi through an immersive ground and aerial Tour- HD
Bullet Bras Evolution || Where did Bullet Bras go to?
The legacy of tariffs imposed under former President Donald Trump has undergone significant revisions and legal scrutiny in recent years, reshaping the landscape of U.S. trade policy. Initially introduced as a cornerstone of the Trump administration's "America First" economic strategy, these tariffs have faced both administrative modification and judicial review under subsequent leadership.
Following a comprehensive statutory review of Section 301 tariffs—originally levied by the Trump administration against Chinese imports—the Biden administration implemented targeted increases in 2024. The revised measures, finalized in September of that year, aimed to counter what the administration described as “unfair trade practices” by China. The new tariffs notably targeted high-tech and green energy sectors, including electric vehicles, solar cells, semiconductors, and critical minerals.
The rate hikes were considerable, with some categories facing duties of up to 100%. The changes were positioned as part of a broader strategy to promote domestic manufacturing and safeguard U.S. technological competitiveness in key industries.
In a landmark decision issued in May 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that President Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs was unconstitutional. The court held that such actions exceeded executive authority and required explicit congressional approval.
This decision directly impacted the controversial "Liberation Day" tariffs announced during Trump’s 2024 campaign, which had established a blanket 10% tariff on all imports, alongside additional surcharges on goods from over 60 countries. The court's ruling led to the immediate suspension of these tariffs, though the Trump legal team promptly filed an appeal.
While the appellate court granted a temporary stay on the lower court's ruling—allowing the tariffs to remain in effect for the time being—the legal uncertainty has introduced volatility into trade and financial markets. Analysts have warned of potential disruptions, particularly in U.S. Treasury markets, should the tariffs be reinstated or removed without clarity.
Moreover, the court’s decision underscores broader questions about the limits of executive power in matters of international trade. It also complicates efforts by the Trump campaign to use tariff policy as a central plank in its economic platform ahead of the 2024 presidential election.
As of May 2025, the status of the Trump-era tariffs remains in flux. While the Biden administration has selectively revised and expanded tariffs to serve strategic economic goals, judicial intervention has curtailed some of the broader tariff actions initiated under Trump. The interplay between policy, law, and international trade continues to shape the United States' approach to global economic engagement
0 comments